TL;DR
Get business pricing on garage and car supplies
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
Road.cc tested Nutrak’s TPU inner tube with a copper Presta valve, weighing it at 56.8g. The reviewer reported no punctures during testing but said the tube is heavier and bulkier than other TPU options, and did not find its potential durability benefit enough to justify the trade-off. Long-term durability remains unproven.
Road.cc has reviewed Nutrak’s 56.8-gram TPU inner tube, which pairs a thicker-than-usual construction with a copper Presta valve in an effort to balance reduced weight with durability. The reviewer reported no punctures during testing, but found the tube heavier and bulkier than other TPU models and said the results were not enough to establish long-term durability.
The tube occupies a middle ground between conventional butyl inner tubes and lightweight TPU alternatives, according to the road.cc review. At 56.8g, it was substantially lighter than the reviewer’s standard butyl tube, which weighed 138.4g. But it was heavier than two other TPU tubes cited in the test: a standard-size example at 27.8g and a gravel model for 40–50mm tyres at 48.9g. Those are specific comparisons from the reviewer’s testing, not a claim that every competing tube weighs the same.
The reviewer also found the Nutrak tube took up more packed space than other TPU tubes they had used, estimating that two standard TPU tubes could fit into about the same space as one Nutrak. The metal valve was presented as a practical difference: the reviewer said it felt more robust than plastic valve stems on many lightweight TPU tubes, particularly for riders using some electric pumps. The review does not establish compatibility with every pump.
During the test, the reviewer experienced no punctures or other problems. They explicitly cautioned that this was not enough to draw a firm conclusion about durability over the long term. The review assigned the product an overall score of 5/10, with 8/10 for quality and performance and 5/10 for value. The reviewer said the tube worked as intended but would not buy it and would probably not recommend it, citing its weight and size compared with other TPU choices.
The Durability Trade-Off for Riders
The review addresses a decision riders make when carrying a spare or choosing an inner tube: how much weight and storage space to exchange for a potentially sturdier design. TPU tubes are often selected for their low weight and compactness. Nutrak’s approach retains a substantial weight saving over the butyl tube tested, while its thicker construction and metal valve may appeal to riders who prefer a more substantial spare.
However, the test does not show that the added material produces a confirmed durability advantage. The reviewer had no punctures, but a trouble-free test period alone cannot establish that the tube will last longer or resist more punctures than lighter alternatives. Riders weighing the purchase should treat durability as a possible benefit, not a proven result, and compare the specific tube weights, packed sizes and prices available to them.
Cost is another part of the trade-off. Road.cc noted that some retailers offered two lightweight TPU tubes for around £11, while the review cited a PSIKIC tube priced at £15.99 when last tested and said Tubolito models were often available below their recommended retail prices. The review did not provide a specific Nutrak price in the supplied material, so those examples do not establish a direct price comparison for every retailer or current listing.
Products Worth Considering
VIOFO A229 Pro 4K HDR Front and Rear Dash Cam
VIOFO A229 Pro 3-Channel 4K Dash Cam with STARVIS 2 Sensors
Chemical Guys 14-Piece Arsenal Builder Car Wash Kit with Foam Blaster
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How Nutrak Compares With Other Tubes
The product is a TPU bicycle inner tube with a copper Presta valve and slightly thicker TPU, according to the technical description in the source material. The manufacturer’s stated features include lightweight construction, a valve intended to improve strength and corrosion resistance, high air retention compared with standard rubber tubes, compatibility with most Presta pumps and compact storage. These are manufacturer claims; the review does not report independent measurements of air retention or corrosion resistance.
The review’s measurements provide a limited comparison with other tubes. Nutrak weighed 56.8g in the test, close to the stated 56g product weight, while the reviewer’s butyl tube weighed 138.4g. The other TPU examples weighed 27.8g and 48.9g. The reviewer also described the Nutrak as larger when packed, but the source provides no exact packed dimensions. Results may vary by tube size and model, so the figures should not be treated as a universal comparison across all products.
Road.cc disclosed that its reviews include retailer links that may earn the publication a commission when readers buy through them. The publication said its reviews remain independent. That disclosure describes a possible commercial relationship; it does not, by itself, establish whether a particular reader’s purchase will generate a commission.
“I had no punctures or problems with the Nutrak tubes during testing, although that’s obviously not enough to make any definitive claims about long-term durability.”
— Road.cc reviewer
What the Test Cannot Establish
The source does not specify the duration, mileage or conditions of the test, nor does it give the number of tubes tested. It is consequently unclear how the tube would perform across extended use, repeated inflation, different tyre pressures or varied riding surfaces. The reviewer’s lack of punctures is a report of their own test, not a controlled comparison of puncture resistance.
The claimed durability benefit of thicker TPU is not quantified in the supplied review. There is no reported side-by-side durability test against thinner TPU models, and no exact packed-size measurements. The manufacturer’s claims about air retention and the copper valve’s strength and corrosion resistance are not accompanied here by test results. The source also does not state a current Nutrak retail price, limiting precise value comparisons.
Compare Before Choosing a Spare
The immediate next step for riders considering the tube is to check the exact size and valve specification against their wheel and tyre setup, then compare its current price and packed dimensions with other available TPU and butyl tubes. Riders who regularly use an electric pump may also want to verify that the valve and pump connection suit their equipment; the review’s comments do not guarantee compatibility with every pump.
Further testing over a longer period, or a controlled comparison with lighter TPU models, would be needed to substantiate a durability advantage. Road.cc’s review does not announce a follow-up test or manufacturer response. Until additional evidence is available, the product’s sturdier feel and metal valve remain potential advantages, while its measured weight and reported bulk are the clearest established trade-offs.
Key Questions
How much does the Nutrak TPU tube weigh?
The road.cc reviewer measured it at 56.8g; the product’s technical details list its weight as 56g.
Did the reviewer experience punctures?
No punctures or other problems occurred during the reviewer’s testing. The review does not give the test duration or mileage and says this is not enough to establish long-term durability.
Is the Nutrak tube lighter than a butyl tube?
In the test, Nutrak weighed 56.8g, compared with 138.4g for the reviewer’s standard butyl tube. It was heavier than the two other TPU examples cited in the review, at 27.8g and 48.9g.
What does the copper valve offer?
The reviewer said the metal valve felt more robust than plastic stems found on many lightweight TPU tubes, including for use with some electric pumps. The manufacturer also claims improved strength and corrosion resistance, but the supplied review does not report independent tests of those claims.
Did road.cc recommend buying it?
The review gave the tube an overall 5/10. The reviewer said they would not buy it and would probably not recommend it, because they did not consider its potential advantages worth the weight and size penalty compared with other TPU tubes.
Source: rss
